It has been a long held opinion of mine and many of my friends that aerodynamics are the problem with the lack of overtaking. If a lack of overtaking is the problem, and I’m not sure that it is. Perhaps the real problem is the lack of close racing. Close racing can be exciting even if there isn’t much overtaking. I remember Mansell chasing Senna at the end of a Monaco GP. Real edge of the seat stuff, did he get by? No.
But thinking about the effect of aerodynamics on it’s own is only a portion of the problem. In fact it’s the cars that are the problem and by that I mean they are a victim of their own success.
The cars and each aspect of the cars is so finely tuned to the ideal or perfect situation that either that ideal makes the cars perform so well it’s difficult to overtake or in some cases the overtaking move will take the car out of that ideal situation and be a massive detriment to its performance so much so that the overtake cannot happen.
Examples? Well, dirty air from aerodynamics is the one we all know. But there are others. Short stopping distances from carbon brakes. Marbles off line from sticky tyres. Short overtaking distances from powerful engines and optimised traction. All of these things will make overtaking more difficult. But they are the stock and trade of the F1 engineers.
Have I an answer? No. But if I were starting to find out I’d have a look at trading off some downforce for reduced drag.
Other than that it’s a trip to the Goodwood Revival.